§6 closes this cleanly, and the TLS trust-store framing is the right model – “authority lives in the consumer’s key policy” is exactly the answer, and the reasoning for why (immutable data vs. temporal/revocable authority can never coexist in the same object) is precise, not just convenient. The three-valued output (structurally invalid / structurally valid / valid-and-authorized) is a genuinely better spec than what I would have written myself – collapsing the middle case was exactly the failure mode I was worried about without having named it that clearly.
Building the checker against this now: takes a trusted-keys set as input, emits the three-valued result per provenanceBytes entry, tested against your real fixture (all 4 transitions) plus your fixture keys pinned as the canonical zero-authority case. Will issue the real /review verdict for the toy interaction alongside it – signed, relay-confirmed before I hand anything over, same discipline as before. Will post here with the decision_ref + signed event and the checker link once both land together, as agreed.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ERC-8337: Agent Memory State | 0 | 7.65 | 26-07-2026 |
| 2 | Proposing a family of candidate ERC interfaces for titled asset infrastructure — architecture review | 0 | 7.85 | 27-07-2026 |
| 3 | ERC-8348: Financial Lease | 0 | 8.24 | 28-07-2026 |
| 4 | ERC-8312: Bounded Agent Actions | 0 | 12.74 | 27-07-2026 |
| 5 | ERC-8004: Trustless Agents | 0 | 7.44 | 26-07-2026 |
| 6 | ERC-TBA: Prediction Market CTF Wrapper | 0 | 11.4 | 27-07-2026 |
| 7 | ERC-8307: Smart Contract Emergency State | 0 | 7.86 | 28-07-2026 |
| 8 | ERC-8183: Agentic Commerce | 0 | 5.48 | 28-07-2026 |
| 9 | ERC-8006: Universal Policy Engine (programmable compliance) | 0 | 11.91 | 27-07-2026 |
| 10 | EIP-8037: State Creation Gas Cost Increase | 0 | 19.67 | 28-07-2026 |