Despite the EPFO launching the EPF 2026 scheme to speed up digital claim processing, the EPF Officers' Association has pointed out in a letter to the Minister of Labour & Employment, has highlighted that numerous auto EPF claims have been stuck in the system for more than 20 days without any updates for field offices or members.

In a letter dated August 3, 2026, which was also marked to the chairman of the Central Board of Trustees (CBT), EPF, the officers' body emphasized several key policy-level issues affecting the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO).

They expressed worries about the slow claim processing, the implementation of the Centralized IT Enabled System (CITES), a lack of technical and field staff, the leadership framework within the EPFO and the need for reforms in the Employees' Pension Scheme (EPS).

In the letter, the officer group also claimed that the EPFO's staffing sanctions are at March 2008 levels and there has been no direct ISD recruitment since 2004. It also raised the demand to reconsider appointing outside officers to senior roles within the EPFO.

Here, we will cover some of the key issues and suggestions made in the letter of the EPF Officers' Association.

The EPF officers' association stated that it was claimed that with the implementation of CITES, the majority of EPF claims would be processed automatically, within 2-3 days.

"Unfortunately, the experience till now has been quite the opposite. Lakhs of auto claims were kept pending in the system for more than 20 days, with no explanation to either the field offices or to the members," reads the letter.

"Field functionaries were left to their own devices for answering multitude of grievances on official grievance channels, social media & in person," the letter claims.

The officers' body says the problem has been further aggravated because instead of coming out with realistic timelines and keeping the public informed, it has been consistently said that nothing is wrong and all claims will be settled within two days.
"In todays' day undefined this creates a perception of misinformation & hiding," says the letter.

The letter mentioned that the CITES project was given to the CDAC in January 2023, with a 10-month timeline, but had been delayed inordinately.

"The project has been inordinately delayed in the development stage and even now it has been implemented in July 2026 in a piecemeal manner," reads the letter.

The officers' body pointed out that the EPFO's policy-level failure was that it tried to run a modern, technology-driven organisation with insufficient internal IT infrastructure.

"There has been no recruitment in the critical Information Services Division (ISD) of EPFO for the past several years. The last direct recruitment to ISD was done in the year 2004, i.e. 22 years ago. We have been unable to even recruit a full-time CTO for the EPFO for the past 3 years," the letter mentioned.

The officers' body mentioned that the last organisational-level assessment of workload was done by the EPFO in 2016-17, and its field offices & in-position manpower continue to function on the basis of that assessment.

"Metro offices such as Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Gurugram are under severe strain, handling technology savvy subscribers with outdated staffing norms. This mismatch has led to rising grievances and operational stress," says the letter.

The association also says the government has been unable to enhance pension benefits under EPS, as actuarial evaluations have consistently reported a significant deficit.

"A key reason lies in the fact that when the EPS was introduced in 1995, prevailing interest rates were in the range of 12-13%, which have since declined substantially," says the employee body.

While designing EPS 2026, the government had an opportunity to restructure the scheme to ensure financial viability while retaining inclusivity for new members, says the letter.

The letter mentions that while the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) permits only three withdrawals during the entire service span of an individual, the EPFO allows multiple withdrawals.
"If the provident fund is treated merely as a bank account, retirement savings will be inadequate. The concern is compounded by the fact that new EPF members are excluded from the EPS, resulting in the absence of secured savings for the future," reads the letter.

The officers' body compared the EPFO leadership with that of the PFRDA, pointing out that the latter was led by domain experts.

It also claimed that around 20% of senior cadre posts in the EPFO have been earmarked for deputation. It requested the Chairman of the Central Board to review the existing policy governing such appointments.
"If the EPFO continues to be treated like a generalist organisation where anyone, with no prior experience, can one day come to occupy a top policy-making position, then how can we be expected to compete with other expert financial sector organisations?," says the letter.