Staten Island judge on Monday temporarily blocked New York City’s rollout of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax, pausing enforcement while a lawsuit brought by a group of homeowners moves forward. Under the temporary restraining order, the city must take down the public tax roll and is barred from issuing any additional notices while the order is in effect. The next hearing is set for 2:15 p.m. August 31. The judge said from the bench that the notices caused irreparable harm because they did not explain why recipients had been flagged for the surcharge and warned that homeowners who failed to...
Posted on 08/10/2026 2:15:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Staten Island judge on Monday temporarily blocked New York City’s rollout of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax, pausing enforcement while a lawsuit brought by a group of homeowners moves forward.
Under the temporary restraining order, the city must take down the public tax roll and is barred from issuing any additional notices while the order is in effect. The next hearing is set for 2:15 p.m. August 31.
The judge said from the bench that the notices caused irreparable harm because they did not explain why recipients had been flagged for the surcharge and warned that homeowners who failed to file for an exemption would be subject to the tax.
The ruling came hours after Mamdani, at a Monday morning news conference, vowed to “vigorously defend” the city’s position in court.
The pied-à-terre tax places a surcharge on non-primary residences in New York City valued at least $5 million and on condominiums and co-ops valued at $1 million or more. It was enacted as part of the state budget and signed into law in May in an effort to close the city’s budget gap. Gov. Kathy Hochul announced the proposal alongside Mamdani in April and signed it into law.
The lawsuit, filed Friday in state Supreme Court, Richmond County, was brought by three homeowners — Simon Hedley, Rachel O’Brien and Carmine Morano — who allege the city incorrectly identified their homes as potentially subject to the surcharge despite the properties serving as their primary residences, according to a news release.
The suit does not challenge the legality of the tax itself but scrutinizes the city’s release of a tax roll that included the names, and addresses and property values of more than 900,000 New York City residential properties — including those not subject to the tax —
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Message from Jim Robinson:
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
1 posted on 08/10/2026 2:15:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
Any time some judge blocked one of PDJT’s initiatives, CNN presented it as a done deal, Orange Man Bad was stopped dead in his tracks by a heroic member of the Judiciary Branch.
2 posted on 08/10/2026 2:17:27 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: SeekAndFind
It is estimated at over 17,000 property owners received letters alerting them that they may be subject to the surcharge.
This ruling also states that those who received the letters need not respond.
3 posted on 08/10/2026 2:17:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
"It is estimated at over 17,000 property owners received letters alerting them
that they may be subject to the surcharge."
Lunatic liberal's greed for other people's money knows no bounds.
The democrat party should be designated as a terrorists organization,
it's what they do.
4 posted on 08/10/2026 2:24:53 PM PDT by chief lee runamok (tek grudate, quality learing center)
To: chief lee runamok
They voted for it so I am SOOOOOO happy for them.
5 posted on 08/10/2026 2:39:23 PM PDT by devane617 (Facts Do Not Matter To Those On The Left—It's Their God.)
To: SeekAndFind
6 posted on 08/10/2026 2:46:53 PM PDT by CFW
To: SeekAndFind
What, you mean doxxing rich people wasn’t the greatest tactical decision? Whaddaya know...
7 posted on 08/10/2026 2:49:57 PM PDT by Billthedrill
To: SeekAndFind
“That’s HEDLEY!” It really is! “Simon Hedley”.
To: SeekAndFind
Mamdani: “What? A judge stopping the actions of a duly elected leader due to the judge’s personal bias and opinions? I’ll bet that has never happened before.”
Somewhere a man with golden hair is smiling.
9 posted on 08/10/2026 2:53:40 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
To: SeekAndFind
One wonders if the judge recieved one of the letters. LOL
10 posted on 08/10/2026 3:00:27 PM PDT by FiddlePig (The greatest threat to our sacred liberty is to not value it!””)
To: SeekAndFind
These are bills for tens of thousands of dollars for free bus rides.
11 posted on 08/10/2026 3:00:32 PM PDT by bray (Thank God for Israel)
To: SeekAndFind
I translate pied-a-terre as foot-on-the-ground from French, but what is a pied-a-terre tax?
I’m not a poly-lingual, but can converse in several languages including a bit of English.
12 posted on 08/10/2026 3:00:39 PM PDT by ReganFan4ever (Jesus saves. Moses invests.)
To: ReganFan4ever
In theory it is a tax on a second home in the taxing jurisdiction.
The details of the New York City tax are very complex because housing arrangements in the city vary widely, particularly with many condos and coops as well as corporate ownership of a lot of housing.
13 posted on 08/10/2026 3:06:46 PM PDT by cgbg (Four seconds is all it takes to beat the brainwashing.)
To: SeekAndFind
And the governor is in accord with the tax.
Kiss nyc goodbye.
14 posted on 08/10/2026 3:08:16 PM PDT by ReganFan4ever (Jesus saves. Moses invests.)
To: ReganFan4ever
I translate pied-a-terre as foot-on-the-ground from French, but what is a pied-a-terre tax?
A pied-a-terre is a place somewhere far from where one makes one's home, a "foot on the ground" in a distant land. Traditionally, it would be a small home or flat in a distant city. Like a wealthy family in Chicago having a flat in Paris or London. Waiting for them, should they want to go there. No need for a hotel.
15 posted on 08/10/2026 3:10:27 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: Steely Tom
In NYC it could just be a wealthy resident of Westchester County or Connecticut who does not want to have to commute during the week.
Lol.
16 posted on 08/10/2026 3:14:49 PM PDT by cgbg (Four seconds is all it takes to beat the brainwashing.)
To: SeekAndFind
How big would a condominium valued at $1 million be in New York City? 500 square feet?
To: cgbg
So, a real estate company who owns, say, 200 units at a fmv of 400 millions, will have to pay the on the whole $400 mil?
18 posted on 08/10/2026 3:18:31 PM PDT by ReganFan4ever (Jesus saves. Moses invests.)
To: ReganFan4ever
19 posted on 08/10/2026 3:19:19 PM PDT by ReganFan4ever (Jesus saves. Moses invests.)
To: devane617
RE: They voted for it so I am SOOOOOO happy for them
Most of those who voted for Mamdani were under 30, or lower middle class who don’t own homes, much less a second home.
And yes, they approve of this tax.
20 posted on 08/10/2026 3:20:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson