Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
In Schwarzschild vacuum, the Kretschmann scalar is
##K = R_{abcd}R^{abcd} = \frac{48M^2}{r^6}##
I notice that ##\sqrt{K}## has dimensions of ##[\text{length}]^{-2}## and a clean ##1/r^3## profile.
Has ##\sqrt{K}## (as opposed to ##K## itself) appeared in any published work as a physically meaningful quantity? I'm aware of ##K## being used for singularity detection and invariant classification, but
I'm curious whether the square root has ever been studied separately.
Thanks for any references.
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Roberto Pavani said:
Has K (as opposed to K itself) appeared in any published work as a physically meaningful quantity?
Can’t comment on whether or not it appears in the literature, but just looking at its form, it’s basically a type of ‘norm’ of the Riemann tensor, so it measures the overall strength of tidal gravity. As such, otherwise different spacetimes can have the same square-rooted Kretschmann scalar, so I suspect there is no more specific physical meaning behind it.
Just my own thoughts.
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
QuarkyMeson said:
I found this: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13204-8
Having the dimensions of an energy density does not make something an energy density, any more than having dimensions of acceleration makes something an observable acceleration. Soooo, it all feels a bit like numerology to me and less like physics.
While dimensional analysis is merely a guide,
it obviously has to be followed up with seeing if
it (obtained from a scalar formed from the riemann tensor) helps characterize quantities of physical interest.
I'm not an astrophysicist, but this seems to do that:
What does a measurement of mass and/or radius of a neutron star constrain: Equation of state or gravity?
Kazim Yavuz Ekşi, Can Güngör, Murat Metehan Türkoğlu
Phys. Rev. D 89, 063003 – Published 6 March, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.063003
https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0488
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
robphy said:
I'm not an astrophysicist, but this seems to do that:
What does a measurement of mass and/or radius of a neutron star constrain: Equation of state or gravity?
Kazim Yavuz Ekşi, Can Güngör, Murat Metehan Türkoğlu
Phys. Rev. D 89, 063003 – Published 6 March, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.063003
https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0488
It seems this paper is exactly what @Roberto Pavani asked for -- a publish paper which uses the square root of the full contraction of the Riemann tensor:
...one can employ the square root of the full contraction of the Riemann tensor (the Kretschmann scalar) ##\mathcal{K}\equiv\sqrt{\mathcal{R}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}\mathcal{R}_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}}=4\sqrt{3}GM_*/c^2r^3##, as a measure of the curvature in vacuum.
Indeed, it seems they use the square root to define the Kretschmann scalar in the first place.
I'm not sure why it matters whether we use the full contraction itself or its square root though?
Thank you all for the references.
In fact, my original curiosity came from the observation that, in Schwarzschild vacuum,
## \mathcal{K} \equiv \sqrt{R^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}}
=
\frac{4\sqrt{3}\,GM}{c^2 r^3}. ##
I was therefore interested in whether this quantity had ever been considered independently of the Kretschmann scalar itself.
The references posted above are very helpful because they show that the square root of the Kretschmann scalar has indeed been used as a physically meaningful measure of spacetime curvature, gravitational field strength, or effective gravitational energy density.
That is exactly the kind of prior literature I was hoping to find, so thank you.
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
postscript (other curvature invariants that could be given a similar treatment):
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deriving relativistic kinetic energy from relativistic momentum | 0 | 7.35 | 04-01-2026 |
| 2 | How to understand the basis transformation of the Rosen metric? | 0 | 8.1 | 10-08-2026 |
| 3 | About the notion of non-standard inertial frame | 0 | 5 | 11-11-2025 |
| 4 | How does reciprocal time dilation work? | 0 | 10 | 12-08-2026 |
| 5 | A question about special relativity | 0 | 5 | 21-05-2026 |
| 6 | Applicability of Spin-2 Field Interpretation of GR | 0 | 5 | 27-06-2026 |
| 7 | )) | 0 | 0 | 15-08-2026 |
| 8 | Is photon frequency intrinsic or observer-dependent? | 0 | 26.67 | 06-08-2026 |
| 9 | Хроматические | 0 | 10 | 10-07-2026 |
| 10 | RSC | 0 | 2.5 | 09-05-2026 |