Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Square root of Kretschmann scalar: any known uses?

Дата публикации: 27-07-2026 13:18:37



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Roberto Pavani
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2026

Join the discussion

Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.

TL;DR
Any known references where ##\sqrt{K}## rather than ##K## is used as a geometric quantity?

In Schwarzschild vacuum, the Kretschmann scalar is

##K = R_{abcd}R^{abcd} = \frac{48M^2}{r^6}##

I notice that ##\sqrt{K}## has dimensions of ##[\text{length}]^{-2}## and a clean ##1/r^3## profile.

Has ##\sqrt{K}## (as opposed to ##K## itself) appeared in any published work as a physically meaningful quantity? I'm aware of ##K## being used for singularity detection and invariant classification, but
I'm curious whether the square root has ever been studied separately.

Thanks for any references.

Discussion

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Roberto Pavani said:

Has K (as opposed to K itself) appeared in any published work as a physically meaningful quantity?

Can’t comment on whether or not it appears in the literature, but just looking at its form, it’s basically a type of ‘norm’ of the Riemann tensor, so it measures the overall strength of tidal gravity. As such, otherwise different spacetimes can have the same square-rooted Kretschmann scalar, so I suspect there is no more specific physical meaning behind it.
Just my own thoughts.

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

QuarkyMeson said:

I found this: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13204-8

Having the dimensions of an energy density does not make something an energy density, any more than having dimensions of acceleration makes something an observable acceleration. Soooo, it all feels a bit like numerology to me and less like physics.

While dimensional analysis is merely a guide,
it obviously has to be followed up with seeing if
it (obtained from a scalar formed from the riemann tensor) helps characterize quantities of physical interest.

I'm not an astrophysicist, but this seems to do that:

What does a measurement of mass and/or radius of a neutron star constrain: Equation of state or gravity?
Kazim Yavuz Ekşi, Can Güngör, Murat Metehan Türkoğlu
Phys. Rev. D 89, 063003 – Published 6 March, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.063003
https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0488

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

robphy said:

I'm not an astrophysicist, but this seems to do that:

What does a measurement of mass and/or radius of a neutron star constrain: Equation of state or gravity?
Kazim Yavuz Ekşi, Can Güngör, Murat Metehan Türkoğlu
Phys. Rev. D 89, 063003 – Published 6 March, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.063003
https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0488

It seems this paper is exactly what @Roberto Pavani asked for -- a publish paper which uses the square root of the full contraction of the Riemann tensor:

...one can employ the square root of the full contraction of the Riemann tensor (the Kretschmann scalar) ##\mathcal{K}\equiv\sqrt{\mathcal{R}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}\mathcal{R}_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}}=4\sqrt{3}GM_*/c^2r^3##, as a measure of the curvature in vacuum.

Indeed, it seems they use the square root to define the Kretschmann scalar in the first place.

I'm not sure why it matters whether we use the full contraction itself or its square root though?

Thank you all for the references.

In fact, my original curiosity came from the observation that, in Schwarzschild vacuum,

## \mathcal{K} \equiv \sqrt{R^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}}
=
\frac{4\sqrt{3}\,GM}{c^2 r^3}. ##

I was therefore interested in whether this quantity had ever been considered independently of the Kretschmann scalar itself.

The references posted above are very helpful because they show that the square root of the Kretschmann scalar has indeed been used as a physically meaningful measure of spacetime curvature, gravitational field strength, or effective gravitational energy density.

That is exactly the kind of prior literature I was hoping to find, so thank you.

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

postscript (other curvature invariants that could be given a similar treatment):

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Deriving relativistic kinetic energy from relativistic momentum07.3504-01-2026
2How to understand the basis transformation of the Rosen metric?08.110-08-2026
3About the notion of non-standard inertial frame0511-11-2025
4How does reciprocal time dilation work?01012-08-2026
5A question about special relativity0521-05-2026
6Applicability of Spin-2 Field Interpretation of GR0527-06-2026
7))0015-08-2026
8Is photon frequency intrinsic or observer-dependent?026.6706-08-2026
9Хроматические01010-07-2026
10RSC02.509-05-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 10. Источник: www.physicsforums.com.