Brad Hershbein, Katherine Lim, Douglas Webber, and Mike Zabek
Using novel data from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, we examine how labor market tightness affects workers’ job quality. We estimate that a 10 percent increase in job vacancies not only increases the probability of changing jobs, it yields an 11–18 percent increase in the (unconditional) probability of switching to a better job overall, and one with greater pay and benefits, interest in the work, and advancement opportunities. Because tight labor markets improve both worker pay and job amenities in roughly the same proportion, their benefits to workers are underestimated when based on pay alone.
June 2026
Local Labor Market Tightness and Job Quality: Evidence from Job ChangersBrad Hershbein, Katherine Lim, Douglas Webber, and Mike Zabek
Abstract:
Using novel data from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, we examine how labor market tightness affects workers’ job quality. We estimate that a 10 percent increase in job vacancies not only increases the probability of changing jobs, it yields an 11–18 percent increase in the (unconditional) probability of switching to a better job overall, and one with greater pay and benefits, interest in the work, and advancement opportunities. Because tight labor markets improve both worker pay and job amenities in roughly the same proportion, their benefits to workers are underestimated when based on pay alone.
Keywords: Job quality, labor market tightness, SHED, JOLTS, Lightcast, local shocks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2026.043
PDF: Full Paper
Disclaimer: The economic research that is linked from this page represents the views of the authors and does not indicate concurrence either by other members of the Board's staff or by the Board of Governors. The economic research and their conclusions are often preliminary and are circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The Board values having a staff that conducts research on a wide range of economic topics and that explores a diverse array of perspectives on those topics. The resulting conversations in academia, the economic policy community, and the broader public are important to sharpening our collective thinking.
Last Update: June 22, 2026
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FEDS Paper: Measuring Macroeconomic Stars: A Framework with Scarring Effects | 0 | 11.1 | 31-07-2026 |
| 2 | FEDS Paper: Cyclical Fluctuations, Financial Frictions, and Productivity Differences across Firms | 0 | 9.8 | 26-06-2026 |
| 3 | FEDS Paper: How Firms Form Beliefs and the Implications for Inflation | 0 | 7.7 | 31-07-2026 |
| 4 | FEDS Paper: Demand Shocks and Endogenous Uncertainty | 0 | 10.66 | 17-07-2026 |
| 5 | ЦБ: рынок труда остается жестким | 0 | 0 | 21-03-2025 |
| 6 | 'Grim' New jobs report a 'kick in the guts': economics expert | 0 | 7.64 | 07-08-2026 |
| 7 | ЦБ: В России замедлился рост заработных плат | 1 | 9.38 | 24-07-2026 |
| 8 | Graduates 43.8% less likely to get informal jobs: EAC-PM study | 0 | 7 | 22-06-2026 |
| 9 | Trump’s July 4th Jobs Report Shows American Dream Slipping Out of Reach for Many Working Families | -5 | 6 | 02-07-2026 |