American political historians and historically oriented political scientists have coalesced around an account of our politics since Ronald Reagan's 1980 election. The standard story goes like this: the Reagan Revolution swept conservatives into power and retrenched environmental protections along with civil rights; feminism ran aground as the Equal Rights Amendment failed; and all the while the Democratic Party morphed into a neoliberal apparatus that bent the knee to Reagan and George H.W. Bush's deregulatory agenda.

As historian Joe J. Ryan-Hume shows in Resisting Reagan (covering the first twelve years of the Reagan Revolution), this story is so incomplete as to be almost misleading—a just-so story that paints a bleaker picture than the actual historical record. Resisting Reagan is a valuable addition to the literature that should be read by Americanist political scientists, whatever their methodological persuasion. Ryan-Hume's most substantial contribution is the original archival research that makes the received wisdom difficult to sustain unmodified going forward.

Ryan-Hume frames the book as analyzing three strands of liberalism: its “intellectual” strand (defining what 1980s liberalism means); its “institutional” strand (Congress); and its “processes of mobilization” (int

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

newsstand locator