Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

West Farms Preservation LLC v. Francisco

Дата публикации: 05-08-2026 17:42:54



The court dismissed this nonpayment proceeding for a defective rent demand. After the tenant's Section 8 subsidy was terminated, the landlord sought rent amounts attributable to the Section 8 portion even though the tenant had not signed rent-stabilized renewal leases after termination of the subsidy. The court held that the tenant cannot be held responsible for the Section 8 portion of the rent absent a new agreement following subsidy termination.



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Housing Type

Section 8 voucher

Court

Civil Court of the City of New York

County

Bronx County (Bronx)

L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number

LT-327061-25/BX

Petitioner

West Farms Preservation LLC

Respondent

Arelis Francisco; Paul Lozada

Judge

Gonzalez, Alberto M.

Decision/Order Date

2026-07-28

Posture

Pre-Answer Motion by Tenant

Disposition

Case Dismissed/discontinued

Winner

Tenant Substantially Won

Synopsis

The court dismissed this nonpayment proceeding for a defective rent demand. After the tenant's Section 8 subsidy was terminated, the landlord sought rent amounts attributable to the Section 8 portion even though the tenant had not signed rent-stabilized renewal leases after termination of the subsidy. The court held that the tenant cannot be held responsible for the Section 8 portion of the rent absent a new agreement following subsidy termination.

Keywords

Defective Rent Demand; Section 8 Voucher; Tenant Not Responsible For Section 8 Portion Of Rent Absent New Agreement After Termination Of Subsidy

Recommended Citation

"West Farms Preservation LLC v. Francisco" (2026). All Decisions. 2346.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/2346

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Cavallo v. Cabral07.8205-08-2026
2Javaid v. 1129 59 Lofts LLC09.5905-08-2026
31770 Dean Inc v. Paul-Sommerville06.5605-08-2026
4Department of Housing Preservation and Development v. 2500 Bedford LLC010.105-08-2026
5Yun Hoe Wong v. Wong010.2605-08-2026
61627-1635 Amsterdam Ave. LLC v. Wolfe06.105-08-2026
7Chun Ying Zhang v. Liya Wang08.6505-08-2026
8GVS Props. III, LLC v. Cruz05.1605-08-2026
9Fabo v. 89 Hicks St., LLC06.5805-08-2026
10Concern Pitkin, LLC v. Crosland0805-08-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 8.28. Источник: ir.lawnet.fordham.edu.