Rishi Sunak faces the final PMQs of the year today amid fears the Tories are plunging into a repeat of Brexit wars after he dramatically saw off a mutiny on his Rwanda plan.

The premier will aim to send his troops into the Christmas break on a positive note after yesterday's extraordinary arm-twisting and coaxing. 

The emergency legislation designed to get deportation flights going cleared its first Commons hurdle by 313 votes to 269 - a majority of 44. 

However, dozens of MPs abstained - with grim threats from both the wings of the party to crash the Bill when it returns to Parliament in January. 

Rebels on the Tory Right say the will 'kill' the new laws unless Mr Sunak toughens them up, while there are complaints from the One Nation faction that it already goes too far in watering down international human right rules.

MPs have voiced alarm that the situation is 'Brexit all over again' with the 'same arguments, the same groups, the same people leading them'. 

Those tensions ended the premierships of David Cameron and Theresa May, and only finally eased thanks to Boris Johnson's 2019 election landslide.

But in a round of interviews this morning James Cleverly insisted Conservatives are 'united' in a desire to get the legislation right.

He risked fuelling tensions with right-wingers by suggesting they would be harming their own interests by blocking the Bill.  

'We of course are more than willing to listen to good faith amendments that are designed to make the Bill better, keep it within the bounds of international law, keep it in a state that the Rwandans are happy to work with,' he said.

Put to him that 'a lot of Tories' do not want the legislation to work, he told Sky News: 'No, this is absolutely wrong. The Conservative Party is united on the desire to get this right and to stop the boats.

'The Labour Party's position is to try and wreck it.'

Despite a day of sabre-rattling, no Tories voted against the legislation last night. 

Some 29 deliberately sat out the division, including Suella Braverman and former immigration minister Robert Jenrick. Several of those who abstained seem to object to the harshness of the measures rather than them being too weak. 

It would have needed around 29 Tories voting against or 57 abstentions to overturn the government majority. 

In reality the figure would have had to be higher as five independents supported the party line. They included ex-Tory Peter Bone, who has just returned from being suspended from the House.

A defeat on the totemic policy could well have been terminal for Mr Sunak - although he still faces a massive test to push the legislation through the rest of the Parliamentary process. 

One rebel on the Tory Right said: 'This Bill has been allowed to live another day. But without amendments, it will be killed next month. It's now up to the Government to decide what it wants to do.'

Any attempt to harden the legislation - even if Mr Sunak were minded to do so - would provoke howls of protest from the One Nation wing of the party. 

Moderates have already been voicing disquiet at the measures to loosen human rights rules. 

Ex-Cabinet minister Damian Green told Sky News that the law 'goes right to the edge of what is acceptable' 

He pointed out that the government had 'quite a big win', adding there was 'less opposition than people were expecting'. 

Mr Sunak was seen hugging chief whip Simon Hart in the Commons just seconds after the result was declared. 

Posting on social media after the announcement, Mr Sunak said: 'The British people should decide who gets to come to this country – not criminal gangs or foreign courts. 

'That's what this Bill delivers. We will now work to make it law so that we can get flights going to Rwanda and stop the boats.' 

Before the vote, Mark Francois, chair of the right-wing ERG bloc, said: 'We have decided collectively that we cannot support the Bill tonight because of its many omissions.'

He added that Sir Bill Cash, the senior Conservative backbencher, was expected to come forward with proposals to toughen the Bill in the coming weeks.

'The Prime Minister has been telling colleagues today he is prepared to entertain tightening the Bill,' Mr Francois added. 

'We very much hope... those amendments may yet be accepted. If they are not and the Bill remains unamended again, collectively, we agreed to reserve the right to vote against it at Third Reading.'

Hardliners were incensed by the government's tactics during a frantic day of coaxing and strong-arming.

An hour-long breakfast summit at No10 - where potential rebels including Lee Anderson, the Conservative deputy chairman, Miriam Cates and Danny Kruger were served bacon rolls - failed to break the deadlock.

In a sign of alarm among Tory whips, Net Zero minister Graham Stuart was dragged back from the COP28 summit in Abu Dhabi to vote, before heading back to the Middle East in a near-7,000 mile round trip.

MPs on one Commons committee were ordered to cancel a Caribbean visit in order to take part in the showdown. 

One senior right-winger told MailOnline that whips had 'wound people up' by being 'on transmit rather than receive'. 

Despite voting to support the Bill, former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said he could always rescind his backing at a later date.

He said: 'We always reserve the right to do what we have to do when we think it doesn't work, my personal view is I want to see the Government listen and engage.

'Right now this was a very difficult Bill to get through, very contentious, it was the toughest bit of legislation concerning people's rights, in terms of asylum seekers, that we've seen, and that's because the crisis is big and many people are dying in the channel.

'It's happening all over Europe – France is in defiance of the European court, sending people back.

'Denmark passed legislation to send people back, Sweden is doing the same, Germany is in turmoil, Italy is talking about defying the court – this is not just the UK.

'It's part of the problem that all around Europe we're facing, so this is the issue here on our island and we have to resolve it, otherwise it creates chaos.'

Mr Jenrick led Tory opposition to the legislation during a bad-tempered Commons debate.

The MP, who plunged the PM into chaos by quitting as immigration minister last week, branded parts of the emergency legislation 'sophistry' and warned it will not work. 

He said that tougher action is needed because 'the public are watching' and will not tolerate failure. 

Labour is claiming that the UK is now set to hand the African nation £400million after Home Secretary James Cleverly confirmed another £50million is due next year.

A Commons defeat would have marked the first time that a Government had failed to get legislation past a first reading since 1986, when Margaret Thatcher wanted to scrap restrictive Sunday trading laws. 

The Safety of Rwanda Bill has been drawn up in response to last month's Supreme Court ruling that sending Channel migrants to the east African state would be unlawful.

The court found that Rwanda's asylum system was potentially unsafe because there was a risk that migrants could be sent back to their home countries where they might be ill-treated.

Ministers signed a treaty with Rwanda last week stating that migrants sent from the UK will not be deported to their home countries. 

The legislation would declare in law that Rwanda is safe, ruling out further court challenges to the principle of the scheme. It also excludes the plan from parts of the Human Rights Act.

But to the dismay of critics, individual migrants will still be able to lodge legal appeals.