Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Who owns your bones?

Дата публикации: 18-07-2026 11:00:00

Editor in Chief Nancy Shute discusses the history of unethical practices in research on human remains and the progress toward more ethical standards.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

This is a human-written story voiced by AI. Got feedback? Take our survey . (See our AI policy here .)

Scientific research on the workings of the human body has led to major advances in longevity and health. But there have also been dark chapters. The 19th century Viennese physician Joseph Hyrtl became famous for his knowledge of human anatomy — knowledge earned by paying grave robbers to provide subjects for his private collection. He was far from the only researcher at the time to do so.

For centuries, major museums and research institutions have stored, studied and displayed human remains. Some, like Hyrtl’s, were almost certainly obtained unethically. The retention of remains has become increasingly controversial as various groups challenge the ethics of using people’s bodies as tools of research and public education without consent.

In 1990, Congress passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. It requires institutions to return remains and artifacts to lineal descendants, tribes or other culturally affiliated organizations, or gain consent for their continued use.

Progress has been slow, and controversies over remains held by scientific institutions continue to erupt, extending beyond those from Indigenous communities.

In 2021, journalists in Philadelphia reported that the University of Pennsylvania was holding human remains from the 1985 MOVE bombing, in which city police dropped a bomb on a row house serving as headquarters for a group calling for Black liberation. Eleven people were killed, including children. Some of the MOVE families’ remains were used to teach anatomy classes. Although those remains were returned to family members, more have since been found.

Fatimah Jackson, a biological anthropologist recently retired from Howard University in Washington, D.C., is leading a new effort spurred by the MOVE revelations to prevent such abuses. “We’re the ones who are holding this material,” she told freelance contributor Michael Marshall. “The scientists are the culprits here.”

Jackson aims to guide universities and museums in ethically managing remains in their possession that were obtained without consent, including those from African American cemeteries. 

And there’s progress on other fronts. Medical schools now rely on people who choose to donate their bodies after death for anatomy studies. Some schools hold ceremonies honoring donors when the class ends. Hrytl no doubt would have been amazed.

More Stories from Science News on Humans

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Many universities hold seized human remains. What should they do with them?01017-07-2026
2Part of ‘the Family’: When the Beef Industry Mentors Climate Scientists06.424-07-2026
3Festival of Politics: Can we take politics out of museums?09.0327-08-2026
4How and Why We Teach Roman History, with Beth Digeser05.7623-04-2026
5The crucial human component in computing and AI05.9905-06-2026
6Are Movies to Blame?0510-07-2026
7DPhil the Future: AI is Revolutionising Disease Detection and Gene Editing with CRISPR03.0120-11-2024
8Thinking of blowing the whistle? Actions to take, pitfalls to avoid011.0405-08-2026
9Building a better IT future09.3806-06-2018
10Take 5: Let’s Get Ethical019.4127-07-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 8.57. Источник: www.sciencenews.org.