A possible upcoming false-flag operation by Ukraine—backed by Israel—against one or more NATO countries, to be falsely attributed to Russia.

By Claudio Resta

September 22, 2026

Across most European countries, signals are multiplying—from government officials and sometimes even the opposition—that war with Russia is imminent.

European leaders and politicians claim the provocations originate from Russia, while Russia maintains that the provocations come from Ukraine and/or the Baltic states, disguised as false-flag operations.

Rumors are circulating on social media that Ukraine, with Israel’s assistance, intends to carry out false-flag attacks against one or more NATO countries.

Equipment recently loaded onto a Ukrainian An-124 aircraft at Ben Gurion Airport (Tel Aviv, Israel) could potentially be used for this purpose.The type of military equipment loaded onto the trucks is unidentifiable, but it could conceivably consist of replicas or stolen Russian weaponry.

This would, in any case, explain the words of a journalist close to Zelensky, who speaks prophetically of a military event that will soon “give wings to Ukraine.”

Be prepared! It seems something could happen at any moment.

“They are literally saying that within a few days, something will happen that gives Ukraine great hope”—Dmytro Gordon, a journalist close to Zelensky, speaking on Ukrainian television.

“I cannot say what it is—it is a military secret. But I know that in the coming days, something will happen that gives the nation wings.”

No one knows exactly what this means, but there are many possibilities: ranging from a false-flag operation that triggers NATO’s Article 5, to special arms deliveries, or even an open declaration of war by NATO.

Waging war on Russia to break it apart into numerous small states—under Western control, so that their resources and raw materials can be plundered—has long been the goal of forces hostile to it.

This is particularly true within NATO circles and the United Kingdom.

Macron and Merz, however, have not lagged behind in terms of warmongering intent.

What is absurd and incredible is that Estonian Defense Minister of such a dwarf state, Martin Herem has, in fact, declared:

“Estonia is capable of fighting Russia alone. We will destroy Russian infrastructure.”
And furthermore:

“The Estonian army is capable of withstanding Russia on its own. If you cross the border, we will kill you all. Russia must dissolve into numerous independent states.”

The ravings of these deranged individuals should not be underestimated, for it is precisely from these tiny states that a “false flag” operation could originate—one the EU would use to claim that Russia has attacked us.

Two days ago, the British newspaper *The Guardian* published an article citing intelligence alerts from NATO countries; these essentially point to an imminent war with Russia, although the precise scale of such a conflict remains unclear.

Everything seems to be leading toward an imminent clash—and thus toward a form of open warfare spanning every dimension, from the military to the media.

Adding to these alerts—as we know—was Cavo Dragone, an Italian general heading key NATO offices (who is set to step down from his duties in less than a year); he stated that NATO has produced no fewer than 4,000 pages of defense plans regarding Russia.

Michal Koudelka, Director of the Czech Republic’s internal security service, made extremely grave remarks, arguing that a clash with Russia is no longer a matter of years—shifting from earlier predictions of 2030 to 2029, then 2028, and now warnings that this looming confrontation could occur as early as 2027.

Koudelka now states it will be a matter of months, specifically referring to “hybrid warfare” activities—such as drone use, small-scale invasions of NATO territory along the Russian border, and limited incursions.

He also speaks of false-flag provocations and massive influence campaigns, though it is clear that “massive influence campaign” here refers to media and political figures accused of being Putin’s agents.

Ultimately, whether or not a Russian influence campaign against NATO territory is taking place is determined by those who control the narrative—namely, major news outlets, clearly driven by political and financial interests.

Then there is Thomas Nilsson, Director of Swedish Military Intelligence and Security, who described the Leipzig incident as a turning point.

We see the recurring mention of the Leipzig drone incident, which was never actually investigated. While German authorities reportedly attribute it to Russian intelligence, there are clearly no official investigation findings—only assumptions.

Finally, Gerhard Schindler, former President of the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND), stated his conviction that the conflict will escalate into a “hot” phase—for instance, through attacks on the eastern flank, perhaps targeting border posts or a bridge.

Here, however, the head of the Latvian Security Service downplays the situation, emphasizing that there are currently no signs of an imminent attack and that Moscow’s activity might primarily be aimed at spreading fear and uncertainty.

Now, the question to ask isn’t so much what Moscow’s objective is, but rather that of the NATO intelligence agencies issuing these leaks—leaks that come directly from them, based on absolutely no facts.

For it is glaringly obvious that no actual facts are being reported—aside from cases fabricated by the press rather than the courts, such as the Leipzig incident.

So the question arises: could the anticipation of a Russian hybrid war actually *be* the hybrid war itself—waged not by the Russians, but by NATO intelligence agencies to pave the way for a war against Russia?

The answer is yes—absolutely. It is clear that this is blatantly a psychological warfare operation orchestrated by NATO intelligence services.

We must ask ourselves the reason why; after all, from a strictly military standpoint, NATO is in no position to face a conflict with Russia—neither in two or three years, nor, certainly, next year.

The only reason that comes to mind is that this is a way to spur the much-discussed rearmament policies—policies that have been talked about for over a year yet have yielded no tangible results.

In reality, while European industry is indeed supporting Ukraine, it is barely managing to produce enough to meet the Ukrainians’ day-to-day needs. We are a long way off from being in a position to face a direct confrontation with Russia.

Therefore, either that is the reason—a way to further stimulate the push for rearmament—or else it is sheer madness.

No one should be more aware of the current state of European armies than NATO’s own intelligence agencies.

Not to mention the fact that Russia—still actively engaged in Ukraine—would have no conceivable reason to massively expand the front line within a few months, thereby exponentially multiplying the challenges of combat and conflict management.

It is, quite simply, total madness—utterly nonsensical.

I repeat: the only explanation I can find is that this is a maneuver designed to spur rearmament policies, which are objectively languishing.

Part of the reason is a lack of funds: Ukraine keeps asking for money like an infant demanding milk from its mother. A few weeks ago, Zelensky stated he needed 27 billion immediately, only for the Europeans to reply that they could provide just nine.

It is evident, then, that belts have been tightened to the breaking point and the situation is critical.

Furthermore, given the recent German elections, internal stability across European nations appears quite precarious. Straining the welfare state and social spending even further becomes difficult when one must also continue funding Ukraine.

Let alone financing this supposed European rearmament.

In short, the stance taken by Europe’s and NATO’s political and military leadership increasingly resembles a delusion detached from reality; they seem to inhabit a parallel planet—a private “Matrix” of sorts—with no connection to the real world.

Thank also to PietroPaolo Branca and Maurizio Blondet

Latest Articles (2023-Present)
Archived Articles (2019-2022)