Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

The impact of stochastic sea ice perturbations on seasonal forecasts

Дата публикации: 31-08-2026 12:00:00






Numerical weather forecasts of sea ice are unreliable, exhibiting an overly narrow range of plausible sea ice evolutions. Stochastic perturbations introduce randomness to the forecast in order to alleviate this by representing uncertainties in the representation of sea ice physics. We show that including such perturbations in a forecast model improves the reliability of sea ice forecasts, and furthermore results in improved seasonal forecasts of the northern European winter circulation.



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Balmaseda, M. A., Ferranti, L., Molteni, F., and Palmer, T. N.: Impact of 2007 and 2008 Arctic ice anomalies on the atmospheric circulation: Implications for long-range predictions, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1655–1664, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.661, 2010. a

Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met., 57, 289–300, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x, 1995. a

Berner, J., Achatz, U., Batté, L., Bengtsson, L., de la Cámara, A., Weisheimer, A., Weniger, M., Williams, P. D., and Yano, J.-I.: Stochastic Parameterization: Toward a New View of Weather and Climate Models, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 98, 565–588, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00268.1, 2017. a

Brankart, J.-M., Candille, G., Garnier, F., Calone, C., Melet, A., Bouttier, P.-A., Brasseur, P., and Verron, J.: A generic approach to explicit simulation of uncertainty in the NEMO ocean model, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1285–1297, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1285-2015, 2015. a

Breul, P., Ceppi, P., Simpson, I. R., and Woollings, T.: Seasonal and regional jet stream changes and drivers, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 6, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-025-00749-9, 2025. a

Browne, P., de Boisseson, E., Keeley, S., Pelletier, C., and Zuo, H.: Sea ice data assimilation in ORAS6, The Cryosphere, 20, 3299–3311, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-3299-2026, 2026. a

Buizza, R., Milleer, M., and Palmer, T. N.: Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 2887–2908, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712556006, 1999. a

Buizza, R., Leutbecher, M., and Isaksen, L.: Potential use of an ensemble of analyses in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 2051–2066, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.346, 2008. a

Dirkson, A., Denis, B., and Merryfield, W.: A multimodel approach for improving seasonal probabilistic forecasts of regional Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10844–10853, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083831, 2019. a

Dirkson, A., Denis, B., Merryfield, W. J., Peterson, K. A., and Tietsche, S.: Calibration of subseasonal sea-ice forecasts using ensemble model output statistics and observational uncertainty, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 2717–2741, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4332, 2022. a, b

EUMETSAT OSI SAF: Global Sea Ice Concentration Climate Data Record v3.0 - Multimission. V.3. EUMETSAT [data set], https://doi.org/10.15770/EUM_SAF_OSI_0013, 2022a. a

EUMETSAT OSI SAF (2022): Global Sea Ice Concentration Interim Climate Data Record Release 3 - DMSP. V. 3. EUMETSAT [data set], https://doi.org/10.15770/EUM_SAF_OSI_0014, 2022b. a

Fortin, V., Abaza, M., Anctil, F., and Turcotte, R.: Why should ensemble spread match the RMSE of the ensemble mean?, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 1708–1713, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0008.1, 2014. a

Gurvan, M., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Chanut, J., Clementi, E., Coward, A., Ethé, C., Iovino, D., Lea, D., Lévy, C., Lovato, T., Martin, N., Masson, S., Mocavero, S., Rousset, C., Storkey, D., Vancoppenolle, M., Müeller, S., Nurser, G., Bell, M., and Samson, G.: NEMO ocean engine, Version v4.0, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878122, 2019. a

Hersbach, H.: Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for Ensemble Prediction Systems, Weather Forecast., 15, 559–570, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Sabater, M., J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7, 2023. a

Johnson, S. J., Stockdale, T. N., Ferranti, L., Balmaseda, M. A., Molteni, F., Magnusson, L., Tietsche, S., Decremer, D., Weisheimer, A., Balsamo, G., Keeley, S. P. E., Mogensen, K., Zuo, H., and Monge-Sanz, B. M.: SEAS5: the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1087–1117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019, 2019. a, b

Juricke, S. and Jung, T.: Influence of stochastic sea ice parametrization on climate and the role of atmosphere-sea ice-ocean interaction, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 372, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0283, 2014. a, b, c, d, e

Juricke, S., Lemke, P., Timmermann, R., and Rackow, T.: Effects of Stochastic Ice Strength Perturbation on Arctic Finite Element Sea Ice Modeling, J. Climate, 26, 3785–3802, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00388.1, 2013. a, b, c, d, e

Juricke, S., Goessling, H. F., and Jung, T.: Potential sea ice predictability and the role of stochastic sea ice strength perturbations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8396–8403, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062081, 2014. a

Juricke, S., Palmer, T. N., and Zanna, L.: Stochastic sub-grid scale ocean mixing: Impacts on low frequency variability, J. Climate, 30, 4997–5019, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0539.1, 2017. a

Keeley, S., Mogensen, K., Bidlot, J., Balmaseda, M. A., and Hatfield, S.: Introduction of a new ocean and sea-ice model based on NEMO4-SI3, ECMWF Newsletter No. 180, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/180/earth-system-science/introduction-new-ocean-and-sea-ice-model-based-nemo4-si3 (last access: 24 August 2026), 2024. a

Koenigk, T., Mikolajewicz, U., Jungclaus, J. H., and Kroll, A.: Sea ice in the Barents Sea: Seasonal to interannual variability and climate feedbacks in a global coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0450-2, 2009. a

Kretschmer, M., Coumou, D., Donges, J. F., and Runge, J.: Using causal effect networks to analyze different arctic drivers of midlatitude winter circulation, J. Climate, 29, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0654.1, 2016. a

Lang, S. T. K., Lock, S.-J., Leutbecher, M., Bechtold, P., and Forbes, R. M.: Revision of the Stochastically Perturbed Parametrisations model uncertainty scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 1364–1381, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3978, 2021. a, b, c, d, e

Leutbecher, M. and Palmer, T. N.: Ensemble forecasting, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3515–3539, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014, 2008. a

Leutbecher, M., Lang, S., Lock, S.-J., Roberts, C. D., and Tsiringakis, A.: Improving the Physical Consistency of Ensemble Forecasts by Using SPP in the IFS, ECMWF Newsletter, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/elibrary/81616-newsletter-no-181-autumn-2024 (last access: 24 August 2026), 2024. a, b, c

MacLeod, D. A., Cloke, H. L., Pappenberger, F., and Weisheimer, A.: Improved seasonal prediction of the hot summer of 2003 over Europe through better representation of uncertainty in the land surface, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 79–90, 2016. a

Notz, D. and SIMIP Community: Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086749, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086749, 2020. a

Ollinaho, P., Lock, S.-J., Leutbecher, M., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., Bozzo, A., Forbes, R. M., Haiden, T., Hogan, R. J., and Sandu, I.: Towards process-level representation of model uncertainties: stochastically perturbed parametrizations in the ECMWF ensemble, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 408–422, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2931, 2017. a

Palmer, T. N.: Towards the probabilistic Earth-system simulator: A vision for the future of climate and weather prediction, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 841–861, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1923, 2012. a

Palmer, T. N., Buizza, R., Jung, T., Leutbecher, M., Shutts, G. J., Steinheimer, M., and Weisheimer, A.: Stochastic parametrization and model uncertainty, ECMWF Technical Memorandum, 598, https://doi.org/10.21957/ps8gbwbdv, 2009. a

Perlin, K.: Improving Noise, in: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Association for Computing Machinery, 681–682, https://doi.org/10.1145/566570.566636, 2002. a

Peterson, K. A., Smith, G. C., Lemieux, J.-F., Roy, F., Buehner, M., Caya, A., Houtekamer, P. L., Lin, H., Muncaster, R., Deng, X., et al.: Understanding sources of Northern Hemisphere uncertainty and forecast error in a medium-range coupled ensemble sea-ice prediction system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 2877–2902, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4340, 2022. a

Petoukhov, V. and Semenov, V. A.: A link between reduced Barents-Kara sea ice and cold winter extremes over northern continents, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013568, 2010. a, b

Petrie, R. E., Shaffrey, L. C., and Sutton, R. T.: Atmospheric response in summer linked to recent Arctic sea ice loss, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 2070–2076, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2502, 2015. a

Roberts, C. D. and Leutbecher, M.: Unbiased calculation, evaluation, and calibration of ensemble forecast anomalies, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., e4993, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4993, 2025. a

Sanchez, C., Williams, K. D., and Collins, M.: Improved stochastic physics schemes for global weather and climate models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 147–159, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2640, 2015. a

Shapiro, R.: Smoothing, filtering, and boundary effects, Rev. Geophys., 8, 359–387, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG008i002p00359, 1970. a

Siegert, S., Bellprat, O., Ménégoz, M., Stephenson, D. B., and Doblas-Reyes, F. J.: Detecting improvements in forecast correlation skill: Statistical testing and power analysis, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 437–450, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0037.1, 2017. a, b

Smith, D. M., Dunstone, N. J., Scaife, A. A., Fiedler, E. K., Copsey, D., and Hardiman, S. C.: Atmospheric response to Arctic and Antarctic sea ice: The importance of ocean–atmosphere coupling and the background state, J. Climate, 30, 4547–4565, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013568, 2017. a

Smith, D. M., Eade, R., Andrews, M. B., Ayres, H., Clark, A., Chripko, S., Deser, C., Dunstone, N. J., García-Serrano, J., Gastineau, G., Graff, L. S., Hardiman, S. C., He, B., Hermanson, L., Jung, T., Knight, J., Levine, X., Magnusdottir, G., Manzini, E., Matei, D., Mori, M., Msadek, R., Ortega, P., Peings, Y., Scaife, A. A., Screen, J. A., Seabrook, M., Semmler, T., Sigmond, M., Streffing, J., Sun, L., and Walsh, A.: Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss, Nat. Commun., 13, 727, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y, 2022. a, b

Storto, A. and Andriopoulos, P.: A new stochastic ocean physics package and its application to hybrid-covariance data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 1691–1725, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3990, 2021. a, b, c, d

Strommen, K. and Cooper, F. C.: Physical and unphysical causes of nonstationarity in the relationship between Barents-Kara Sea ice and the North Atlantic Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107609, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107609, 2024. a, b

Strommen, K., Mayer, M., Spaeth, J., and Tietsche, S.: Seasonal forecast with stochastic sea ice, Experiment ID imsu, ECMWF [data set], https://doi.org/10.21957/4cdz-q265, 1993a. a

Strommen, K., Mayer, M., Spaeth, J., and Tietsche, S.: Seasonal forecast with stochastic sea ice - control counterpart, Experiment ID ikh7, ECMWF [data set], https://doi.org/10.21957/z96y-yy85, 1993b. a

Strommen, K., Christensen, H. M., MacLeod, D., Juricke, S., and Palmer, T. N.: Progress towards a probabilistic Earth system model: examining the impact of stochasticity in the atmosphere and land component of EC-Earth v3.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3099–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3099-2019, 2019. a

Strommen, K., Juricke, S., and Cooper, F.: Improved teleconnection between Arctic sea ice and the North Atlantic Oscillation through stochastic process representation, Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 951–975, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-951-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k

Strong, C., Magnusdottir, G., and Stern, H.: Observed Feedback between Winter Sea Ice and the North Atlantic Oscillation, J. Climate, 22, 6021–6032, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3100.1, 2009. a

Subramanian, A., Juricke, S., Dueben, P., and Palmer, T.: A stochastic representation of subgrid uncertainty for dynamical core development, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1091–1101, 2019. a

Tian, T., Yang, S., Høyer, J. L., Nielsen-Englyst, P., and Singha, S.: Cooler Arctic surface temperatures simulated by climate models are closer to satellite-based data than the ERA5 reanalysis, Communications Earth & Environment, 5, 111, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01276-z, 2024. a

Vancoppenolle, M., Rousset, C., Blockley, E., Aksenov, Y., Feltham, D., Fichefet, T., Garric, G., Guémas, V., Iovino, D., Keeley, S., Madec, G., Massonnet, F., Ridley, J., Schroeder, D., and Tietsche, S.: SI3, the NEMO Sea Ice Engine, Version 4.2release_doc1.0, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7534900, 2023. a

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, İ., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro, A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors: SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nat. Methods, 17, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2, 2020.  a

Wang, L., Ting, M., and Kushner, P. J.: A robust empirical seasonal prediction of winter NAO and surface climate, Scientific Reports, 7, 279, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00353-y, 2017. a

Woollings, T., Li, C., Drouard, M., Dunn-Sigouin, E., Elmestekawy, K. A., Hell, M., Hoskins, B., Mbengue, C., Patterson, M., and Spengler, T.: The role of Rossby waves in polar weather and climate, Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 61–80, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-61-2023, 2023. a

Xu, Z., Chen, J., Mu, M., Tao, L., Dai, G., Wang, J., and Ma, Y.: A stochastic and non-linear representation of model uncertainty in a convective-scale ensemble prediction system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 2507–2531, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4322, 2022. a

Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M., De Boisseson, E., Hirahara, S., Chrust, M., and De Rosnay, P.: A generic ensemble generation scheme for data assimilation and ocean analysis, ECMWF Technical Memoranda, 795, https://doi.org/10.21957/cub7mq0i4, 2017. a

Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M. A., Tietsche, S., Mogensen, K., and Mayer, M.: The ECMWF operational ensemble reanalysis–analysis system for ocean and sea ice: a description of the system and assessment, Ocean Sci., 15, 779–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-779-2019, 2019. a

Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M. A., de Boisseson, E., Browne, P., Chrust, M., Keeley, S., Mogensen, K., Pelletier, C., de Rosnay, P., and Takakura, T.: ECMWF's next ensemble reanalysis system for ocean and sea ice: ORAS6, ECMWF Newsletter, 180, https://doi.org/10.21957/hzd5y821lk, 2025. a

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Spatial heterogeneity in post-fire permafrost evolution as revealed by satellite radar observations010.9921-08-2026
2Code accessibility and code quality across phases of the models of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project07.2620-08-2026
3Natural disturbances from bark beetle outbreaks and windthrow increasingly affect Europe's most mature and carbon-rich forests011.5731-08-2026
4From regular to random: a unifying framework for step-pool spacing010.1626-08-2026
5Dune aurora: survey from a citizen science database08.2527-08-2026
6Quantifying the influence of wood carbon fractions on tree- and forest ecosystem-scale carbon estimation in a temperate forest010.4825-08-2026
7Water masses in the Atlantic Ocean: water mass ages and ventilation010.6327-08-2026
8Saturation effect of background temperature and aridity on vegetation phenological sensitivity to urban warming011.6528-08-2026
9ЗЕМЛЯ ДЕРЖИТ БАЛАНС ЛУЧШЕ, ЧЕМ ДУМАЛИ УЧЕНЫЕ Кажется очевидным, что ...08.2227-09-2026
10Canada: Early Warning Reporting – Changes May Be Coming01011-06-2026

Классификация: Арктика. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5.36. Источник: www.egu.eu.