I have a question about multi-asset delegation in ERC-8226.
As I understand it, an active mandate is keyed by (agent, principal), while each mandate specifies a single asset.
Does this mean the following two mandates cannot coexist in the same AgentMandate registry?
Principal P + Agent A → Token A
Principal P + Agent A → Token B
If so, what is the intended pattern for an agent managing multiple assets for the same principal?
Use a different agent address per asset?
Deploy separate AgentMandate registries per asset?
Or is supporting multiple mandates for the same (agent, principal) pair something being considered, e.g. (agent, principal, asset) or a mandateId?
I’m mainly curious whether the one-active-mandate-per-pair constraint is intentional, and what deployment pattern you would recommend for multi-asset use cases.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Onchain IP Asset and License Registry | 0 | 8 | 28-09-2026 |
| 2 | ERC-8320: Regulated Asset Claim | 0 | 7.2 | 28-09-2026 |
| 3 | ERC-8392: Asset Status Interface for Tokenized Assets | 0 | 8.06 | 28-09-2026 |
| 4 | ERC-8427: Portable Spend Grants | 0 | 10.76 | 28-09-2026 |
| 5 | ERC-8183: Agentic Commerce | 0 | 12.88 | 28-09-2026 |
| 6 | ERC-8412: Preregistered Acceptance Criteria | 0 | 6.62 | 28-09-2026 |
| 7 | EIP-8425: Quantum Freeze and Account Recovery | 0 | 4.76 | 28-09-2026 |
| 8 | ERC-8415: Asynchronous Register Projection for NFTs | 0 | 12.36 | 28-09-2026 |
| 9 | RFC: Procedure Manifests - Mechanism for AI Agents to Resolve Contractual Disputes | 0 | 9.98 | 28-09-2026 |