Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz was heckled outside of court after the Lindsay Clancy case was ruled a mistrial. Cruz addressed members of the media moments after Judge William Sullivan announced a mistrial at a court in Plymouth, Massachusetts. As he was talking, a woman standing behind him said: 'You only cared when the kids were dead - why didn't you care about the mother?'. Cruz kept a straight face as others around him backed up what the woman shouted, chanting: 'Amen'. As journalists continued to pose questions to Cruz, the woman continued to heckle him, causing him to ask a reporter to repeat their question. She was also seen shaking her head as he spoke and kept on shouting over him before walking away. Others shouted that he was corrupt. Another woman stood behind Cruz was seen shaking her head every time he spoke.

When questioned over whether his prosecutor's case was insensitive, he responded that killing three children was insensitive. 'Insensitive is ignoring those facts, we have an obligation to stand up for those people and seek justice', he added. Cruz maintained Clancy's killing of her children was cold-blooded murder, but that he refused to be drawn on whether he would push for a retrial and said the decision was yet to be made. Prosecutors may also ask for the verdict to be decided by a judge, rather than a jury trial. The jury panel of nine women and three men spent over 37 hours deliberating the case after five weeks of evidence. They sent four notes to the judge this week saying they had been unable to reach a verdict.

Yesterday it emerged that 11 of the 12 jurors had come to the same verdict, but that a twelfth holdout was refusing to follow them. The final note sent by jurors on Friday morning read: 'It is with a heavy heart that we are unable to come to a unanimous decision and will not be able to.' Clancy - who killed her three young children in January 2023 - now faces a grueling retrial. She strangled her children with exercise bands and then allegedly attempted to kill herself, but her efforts failed and left her paralyzed and in a wheelchair for life. The law requires the jury to come to a unanimous decision, and if they are unable to, the judge is forced to declare a mistrial. A mistrial means the prosecution will have the opportunity to try Clancy again. The trial will have to start over from jury selection.

A second trial would not violate Clancy's Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy, which protects citizens from being punished for the same crime twice. The Constitution of the United States prevents the government from trying a person again for the same crime after they have already been found innocent or guilty. But because Clancy's first trial has resulted in a deadlock, the prosecution is allowed to charge her a second time. It is unclear whether the prosecution will move forward with a second trial. Clancy is likely going to be kept institutionalized in the interim while a decision is made.