OmniThoughts said:
Why do some people claim against that
Who specifically claims that, and where did they claim it?
Usually if you look in context then you can see why someone said something.
Science Advisor
2025 Award
Is the question "is simultaneity still relative in a universe with a CMB that provides a global clock"?
If so, yes it's still relative. For example, our GPS clocks do not use the same concept of simultaneity as the CMB one, and they work perfectly. There is no experiment you can do that will tell you that you are wrong to use either the GPS or CMB simultaneity, or any other.
The CMB provides an obvious way to define simultaneity on cosmological scales, and using any other scheme makes the maths harder while obscuring the symmetries. So nobody does it. But it is just convenience - the same kind of convenience as road traffic laws specifying speed relative to the local Earth surface rest frame rather than a Sun-centric frame. You could do the latter and nothing would change except how easy it is to understand what's being said.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Relativistic simultaneity and effects on time | 0 | 5 | 12-01-2026 |
| 2 | A question about special relativity | 0 | 5 | 21-05-2026 |
| 3 | Special relativity and diffracting beams | 0 | 5 | 04-06-2026 |
| 4 | The paradox of symmetrical time dilation | 0 | 5 | 16-02-2026 |
| 5 | Relativity, time, and quantum mechanics | 0 | 5 | 27-02-2026 |
| 6 | Aether equal to spacetime? | 0 | 2 | 29-03-2026 |
| 7 | Can a causal or time-like structure emerge without assuming a metric? | 0 | 5 | 16-02-2026 |
| 8 | Why is the Lorentz Force always perpendicular to velocity? | 0 | 5 | 19-06-2026 |
| 9 | Explanation requested for a relativistic scenario wherein two seemingly valid measurement procedures lead to different results for the same observable | 0 | 5 | 18-05-2026 |
| 10 | Help with problem in MIT open course general relativity | 0 | 5 | 03-04-2026 |