England camera cable controversy, explained: Three Lions' equalizer appears to hit broadcast equipment in buildup originally appeared on The Sporting News. Add The Sporting News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

After facing a 1-0 deficit early vs. Norway, England bounced back in a big way thanks to Jude Bellingham.

Advertisement

In Saturday's World Cup quarterfinal matchup, which England went on to win in extra time, Bellingham's equalizer before halftime put England back in position to keep its tournament run alive — but not without some controversy.

During the halftime break, Fox's studio crew showed that in the moments prior to Bellingham's goal, the ball hit a camera cable up in the air, which should have resulted in a drop ball. Instead, there was no review — though FIFA has denied that the ball hit the cable at all.

Here's a look at the camera cable controversy in England vs. Norway, which visibly upset Norway manager Stale Solbakken.

2026 WORLD CUP HQ:Latest World Cup news | Full World Cup schedule | Buy World Cup tickets

Advertisement

After Norway claimed a 1-0 lead, before halftime, England scored the equalizer. It came after Norway goalkeeper Orjan Nyland took his goal kick high into the air, then two passes later, Bellingham scored on an excellent strike into the goal.

The problem wasn't with Bellingham's goal — as Fox's studio crew showed at halftime, there may have been a missed call on Nyland's kick. A replay of the sequence showed that because Nyland kicked it so high, the ball hit a camera cable high in the air before falling down to the pitch.

After Bellingham's goal and before halftime, Solbakken and other Norway players were seen arguing with the referees, clearly pointing up in the air and discussing the missed call on the camera cable.

What is the rule about a ball hitting a camera cable?

Fox Sports' Rebecca Lowe said at halftime that based on FIFA rules, "if the ball touches any outside object, then the whistle should go, and it should be a drop ball."

Advertisement

By that assessment, the referees should have stopped play as soon as the ball hit the camera cable — but given how high the ball was in the air, it presumably would have been easy for them to miss. FIFA, however, has insisted that the ball did not hit the cable at all.

MORE: Why Erling Haaland plays for Norway despite being born in England

Should VAR have disallowed England goal?

Fox Sports rules analyst Mark Clattenburg also said that the ball hitting the camera cable was a reviewable incident for VAR.

"VAR can interfere if that contact of the ball on the camera cable is part of a reviewable incident, an attacking phase of play leading to a goal is part of the var reviewable incident," Clattenburg said on Fox. "It should have been picked up the VAR.”

Advertisement

Had VAR caught the ball hitting the camera cable, it would have ruled the goal null because it aided England in the attack. Officials, however, did not catch the interference.

MORE: Inside Jude Bellingham's growing history of clutch goals

FIFA statement on ball hitting camera cable

Later on in the broadcast, Lowe said FIFA was denying that the ball hit the camera cable at all on the play. FIFA said in a statement, per Martyn Ziegler, that they "checked the data" and there was "no peak on the graph" to suggest the ball hit a camera cable.

In a social media post, FIFA also showed a clip of the ball in the air with a graph depicting the ball's sensor, arguing that the sensor "showed no peak in the 'heartbeat of the ball' when in the air," and that there was "no evidence that the ball touched the overhead wire and changed the movement of the ball."