Просмотр новости
Найдите то, что Вас интересует
Спутники
РН
SpaceX
Роскосмос
NASA
СпутникиРНSpaceXРоскосмосNASA
Image
CFOs are waking up to an uncomfortable reality. AI spending is climbing steeply, with tokens, agents, licenses, and compute, and the business value is proving surprisingly hard to pinpoint. Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in four months, with its COO publicly struggling to draw a line between AI adoption and the development of meaningful new consumer features. Microsoft has pulled Claude Code licenses from developers as spending on coding agents came under cost governance. In boardrooms and budget reviews across the industry, the same question keeps surfacing: we're producing more than ever, so why aren't outcomes improving?The diagnosis making the rounds is that organizations need to update their operating model. AI has broken the old management system, and a new one must be designed. It's a reasonable conclusion. But for the thousands of organizations already running Scrum, there's a more direct answer: Your operating model never really embraced Scrum. Maybe start there! By using Scrum and aligning your operating model with AI, you can start delivering value on a complex problem. Or at least the challenges will be transparent! The real problem isn't output. It's the absence of outcome focus.AI is extraordinarily good at generating things. Code, content, test cases, and documentation were all produced faster and in greater volume than ever before. That's genuinely valuable. But here's the paradox: when output becomes cheap, demand for output becomes bottomless. Without a mechanism to filter activity against value, spend scales with activity rather than with impact. Teams generate more, spend more on tokens to generate it, and the CFO rightly asks what any of it is delivered to customers.This isn't an AI problem. It's a prioritization and governance problem. And Scrum was built specifically to solve it.The Product Backlog is your value filter.The Product Backlog isn't a to-do list. It's an ordered expression of what matters most to customers and the business right now, owned by a Product Owner who is accountable for value. That ordering is a series of bets: this item is worth more than everything below it.In an AI-augmented team, that function becomes more important, not less. If AI can generate ten times more output per Sprint, then the question of what gets generated becomes ten times more consequential. A well-managed Product Backlog ensures that AI amplification is directed at the highest-value work. A poorly managed one, or worse, a backlog that's treated as an AI task queue, means you're just accelerating in an unknown direction. Uber's problem wasn't that its engineers were using AI. It was that no one had connected that AI activity to a prioritized, outcome-ordered view of what the business actually needed next.The Product Owner's accountability hasn't changed. What has changed is that the cost of acting on weak prioritization is now much higher because the speed of delivery exposes poor decisions more quickly and on a greater scale.The Sprint Goal is your outcome commitment.The Sprint Goal is the single most underused mechanism in Scrum, and the one that matters most in an AI world.Every Sprint, the Scrum Team commits not to a list of tasks but to a specific outcome, something valuable that will be true at the end of the Sprint that isn't true today. That commitment creates a crucial filter: does this activity serve the Sprint Goal? If AI agents generate code, content, or analysis that doesn't align with the Sprint Goal, the team has a clear signal to stop. Not because the output is poor, but because output disconnected from an outcome commitment is just expensive noise.McKinsey data shows that while organizations widely report that AI improves task speed, fewer than 30% see measurable improvement in value delivery. The gap between those two numbers is the Sprint Goal, or rather, its absence. Speed without direction isn't progress. It's accelerating toward the wrong destination. Microsoft's developers weren't lacking in capability; they lacked a governance mechanism that connected their agent activity to outcomes worth paying for.The Sprint Review is your empirical check on value.AI output must be evaluated, not just shipped. This is where the Sprint Review does work that no individual productivity tool can do.Every Sprint, the Scrum Team presents an Increment, something real and usable, to stakeholders, and the conversation is explicitly about value: Did this move the needle? What do customers actually think? What does the data show? That conversation is what connects AI-amplified delivery to business outcomes. It's the empirical feedback loop that tells you whether your token spend is producing value or producing volume.Without that loop, relying on guesswork. And the faster AI makes your teams, the faster you fly blind.This is not a transformation program. It's a Sprint.I'm not arguing that organizations are using Scrum perfectly, or that there's nothing to improve. AI does change how Scrum Teams should work, what belongs in the Definition of Done, how AI agents appear in the Sprint Backlog, and what skills Developers need alongside their tools. Those are real adaptations worth making.But the foundational structure, a prioritized backlog, outcome-focused Sprints, and empirical inspection of value, is exactly what the current moment demands. Organizations don't need to wait for a new operating model to be designed and implemented before they can bring AI spend under meaningful governance. They can start in the next Sprint.If your AI investment isn't delivering value that your customers can feel, the answer probably isn't a new framework. It's a better Sprint Goal, a more disciplined Product Backlog, and a Sprint Review where someone in the room asks, "Did this actually matter?"That's not a radical change. That's Scrum working as intended.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Vlog] AI-native Scrum Team Specifications | 0 | 5 | 22-06-2026 |
| 2 | [Episode 1] How to Start the Team AI Journey | 0 | 5 | 23-06-2026 |
| 3 | Four Main Ways to Learn AI for Scrum Masters | 5 | 7 | 06-07-2026 |
| 4 | AI Transformation for Scrum Teams (Step 4) | 0 | 5 | 25-06-2026 |
| 5 | [Episode 2] AI Basic Literacy for Scrum Team | 0 | 7 | 29-06-2026 |
| 6 | [Episode 3] Start Using AI as a Personal Assistant | 0 | 5 | 08-07-2026 |
| 7 | What Will Happen to You in Two Years if You Don’t Learn AI as a Scrum Master? | -2 | 5 | 10-07-2026 |
| 8 | Silos are the Bane of Value Delivery | -5 | 7 | 29-06-2026 |
| 9 | If You Can Write Acceptance Criteria, You Can Write an AI Routing Policy | 0 | 7 | 05-07-2026 |
| 10 | O Product Owner Moderno Mais Humano do que nunca Como as instâncias do P.O seguem mais valiosas do que nunca | 2 | 6 | 01-07-2026 |