Просмотр новости
Найдите то, что Вас интересует
Спутники
РН
SpaceX
Роскосмос
NASA
СпутникиРНSpaceXРоскосмосNASA
Image
A recent Atlassian article raised a question that deserves serious attention from anyone working in product and technology. Based on a survey of 12,000 knowledge workers and over 170 Fortune 1000 executives, Atlassian found that 89% of executives say AI has made execution faster, yet half of those same leaders report that cross-team coordination has not improved at all. They call it the "AI speed paradox." It is real, it is growing, and frankly, it is not surprising, because the same dynamic has always existed, long before AI entered the picture. In fact, we described a similar problem as Water-Scrum-Fall. We have known for decades that optimizing the individual is not the same as optimizing the system. What AI has done is amplify that truth to the point where it can no longer be ignored.The Unit of Delivery Has Never Been the IndividualThe Atlassian research points to something telling: when asked where they focus their AI strategy, only a small minority of executives said at the individual level. Most said they want to drive value for the organization as a whole. And yet, because individual productivity is easy to measure and organizational outcomes are not, that is where investment and attention flow. The gap between intent and reality is wide, and it is costing organizations dearly.Atlassian cites a Harvard Business Review study suggesting that roughly 80% of enterprise work is collaborative. By focusing almost exclusively on individual AI gains, organizations may be leaving the vast majority of AI's real potential on the table. That is a worrying finding, and it should prompt a different set of questions entirely. Not "is this person faster?" but "are we making better decisions as an organization? Are our teams moving in the same direction? Is it easier to work across disciplines?" For most organizations right now, the honest answer to all three is still "not really."The Scrum Guide is unambiguous on this point. The Scrum Team, consisting of the Developers, Product Owner, and Scrum Master, exists as a coherent, cross-functional unit. It is not a collection of individuals who happen to sit near one another. It is a team designed to deliver value together, bound by shared goals, shared accountability, and a shared Definition of Done. The individual is not the unit of delivery. The team is.When an individual developer accelerates, whether through expertise, tooling, or AI assistance, and does so in isolation. The bottleneck does not disappear. It moves. Work piles up at the next handoff. Integration breaks down. The Sprint Goal, which exists to create coherence and focus for the team, becomes fragmented into a series of disconnected individual completions. As Atlassian's research starkly illustrates, 87% of teams say there is no time or capacity for coordination because everyone is stuck in execution mode.Faster fingers do not make a faster organization. A faster team, operating on a clearer process, with tighter feedback loops, does.Process Is Not Bureaucracy — It Is a Coordination MechanismOne of the more corrosive ideas in the software industry is that process is the enemy of speed. Scrum has suffered enormously from this mischaracterization. In reality, the events, artifacts, and commitments of Scrum exist precisely to enable teams to move fast without losing coherence. The Daily Scrum resynchronizes around the Sprint Goal. The Sprint Review creates an empirical checkpoint with stakeholders. The Sprint Retrospective is structured organizational learning, a dedicated moment to ask not just "did we go fast?" but "are we getting better at working together?"Maybe all of this highlights the importance of having a Scrum Master. After all, even with AI delivering the product, it's still a human system that should be optimized. The Scrum Master is responsible for that optimization. The Atlassian article identifies the problem of getting value out of AI as a lack of context. When organizational knowledge is fragmented, living in meetings that are never summarized, one-off conversations, and disconnected tools, AI behaves, in their words, "like a very confident new hire: fluent, fast, and frequently off-base." Forrester's research reinforces this: 90% of organizations now use generative AI platforms, yet roughly half struggle to see meaningful outcomes. The technology is not the problem. The knowledge and coordination layer is. That is why we wrote the paper ‘The AI teammate framework ’, which describes how you onboard AI. This is exactly the problem that Scrum's transparency principle exists to solve. Artifacts with clear commitments, a visible Sprint Backlog, and a shared Definition of Done are not bureaucratic overhead. They are a shared knowledge layer that keeps a team oriented around the same reality. AI tools inserted into a poorly coordinated system will surface coordination failures faster, not eliminate them. If your handoffs are unclear, AI-generated output will pile up at the same bottlenecks as before, just more of it, more quickly.The question to ask is not "how do we make each person faster?" It is "how do we improve the system through which the team delivers value?"The AI Agent Problem Is a Team ProblemThere is a further complexity on the horizon that Atlassian's research flags and that the Scrum community should take seriously: the rise of AI agents. It is no longer just individual humans who need to be coordinated. Teams are now building agents: a designer's creative agent, a product manager's feedback summarizer, a sales team's pitch assistant, each helpful in isolation, but capable of recreating exactly the same uncoordinated chaos we see in human systems, only faster and at greater scale.This is not a technology problem. It is a team design problem. The same principles that make a Scrum Team effective, clear goals, defined accountability, and shared understanding of what work looks like, apply equally when agents become part of how work gets done. The Sprint Goal remains relevant even when part of the work is now being executed by an agent. If anything, having a clear, shared objective becomes more important, not less, when the system executing work is more complex.What This Means for Teams Adopting AIAtlassian reports that teams that adopt a coherent system for working together see a 68% reduction in what it calls the "fragmentation tax" and are nine times more likely to say AI helps them collaborate effectively. That finding should resonate deeply with any Scrum practitioner. The teams succeeding with AI are not the ones with the best tools. They are the ones with the clearest purpose, the most connected knowledge, and a culture of continuous learning, which is precisely what well-implemented Scrum builds.Atlassian also makes a point worth sitting with: the goal of AI should not only be to generate more output, but to create space for better thinking. To give teams back the cognitive and emotional bandwidth to make real decisions, deepen relationships, and place the bets that actually move an organization forward. That framing is entirely consistent with what Scrum has always been about, not maximizing individual throughput, but enabling teams to do their most meaningful, most valuable work together.A Scrum Team that understands its Sprint Goal, maintains a transparent Sprint Backlog, and holds one another accountable to a shared Definition of Done is already well-positioned to absorb the acceleration that AI offers. The team becomes the integration layer, the place where individual speed transforms into collective value.The paradox dissolves when you stop optimizing the parts and start investing in the whole.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The New AI Operating Model. Start By Using Scrum | 0 | 6 | 07-07-2026 |
| 2 | Silos are the Bane of Value Delivery | -5 | 7 | 29-06-2026 |
| 3 | Your Scrum Team Didn't Get Obsolete. It Got Smaller, Faster, And Aimed At Bigger Work. | 0 | 5 | 22-06-2026 |
| 4 | What Will Happen to You in Two Years if You Don’t Learn AI as a Scrum Master? | -2 | 5 | 10-07-2026 |
| 5 | Four Main Ways to Learn AI for Scrum Masters | 5 | 7 | 06-07-2026 |
| 6 | [Episode 3] Start Using AI as a Personal Assistant | 0 | 5 | 08-07-2026 |
| 7 | Wird Product-Ownership zum Flaschenhals im KI-Zeitalter? Warum viele Product-Owner schlecht priorisieren, warum KI das sichtbar macht und 10 Werkzeuge, um besser zu entscheiden | 0 | 7 | 07-07-2026 |
| 8 | O Product Owner Moderno Mais Humano do que nunca Como as instâncias do P.O seguem mais valiosas do que nunca | 2 | 6 | 01-07-2026 |
| 9 | [Episode 2] AI Basic Literacy for Scrum Team | 0 | 7 | 29-06-2026 |
| 10 | If You Can Facilitate a Retrospective, You Can Audit Your AI | 5 | 7 | 28-06-2026 |